Friday, November 19, 2004
 
Beating Off The Global Pandemic Of Impure Thoughts
America is a dangerous place. Everyone knows this. Terrorists, foreign and domestic, want to blow up our shiny tall buildings. We have an extraordinarily high murder rate compared to other industrialized countries. Nuclear waste material is criss-crossing this country by unsecured train on a daily basis. Killer tornadoes exact personal vengeance on people with whom they are displeased. Victims of adultery regularly set their husbands on fire, go to jail only to eventually get out, go to college, lose 20 pounds and find a new man who won't cheat on them, beat them or rape them.

Those last few I got from the plots of TV movies, but I think you get the general idea. With the eventual exception of the scorned woman rising again to self-esteem and a size 6, we're dealing with some heavy shit around here.

Some of it is so freaky they won't even talk about it on the Lifetime Movie Network.

But still, somehow, I sleep well at night. Sure, part of that is because of the 72-ounce Super Big Gulp filled half and half with RC cola and rum, but past that, I rest under the comforting Laser-Beam Umbrella Of Morality that is our government.

See, when we had our elections nearly three weeks ago, we thought we were voting to keep us and all future generations safe from the scourge of gay sex. Imagine my delight when I realized just today that when you buy Homophobia, you get one heapin' helpin' of Generalized Sexual Repression for absolutely no additional cost!

That's right, consumers. Oil up the locking mechanism on those old chastity belts. The Moral Majority has arrived to save us all from our nasty, horny, animalistic selves.

The holy and righteous power of the Federal Communications Commission has already been unleashed on ABC for daring to show the uncovered shoulders and back of a white woman in the presence of a black man.

And now--God be praised!--instead of getting bogged down with nonsense like air quality or the terror war or law and order, the full weight of the United States Senate has been unleashed against the abomination of pictures of people in various states of undress. And these are available to the general public!

As we all know, it is not enough to avoid sin itself, but also the "occasion of sin", the act of putting oneself in the position to be tempted in the first place that is to be avoided. Clearly the federal government is in the best position of any other body to take this task up directly.

Oops, there, I nearly did it myself. I said "body" and "position" in the same sentence. You see how it works? You start thinking about bodies in positions, then you start Googling "Sally Field naked" or something, then you're abusing yourself in horrible (but probably totally hot) ways. But soon self-gratification will not be enough. Then it will be sex with your partner. Then sex with strangers. Then whores. Then multiple whores. Then multiple midget whores, a bucket of chum, multi-directional sex toys and Madonna. Then members of the same gender. Then children. Then animals.

The dots are so close together they practically connect themselves.

No, the only answer is to outlaw sex altogether. Not just to doing of it, but the looking at it and--hopefully, eventually--the very thought of it.

This problem of people engaging in sexual acts is so ingrained, so intractable I have very little hope of stamping it out altogether. It probably won't matter in the end, though. We'll all soon be dead from mad cow disease or Iranian nuclear missiles anyway.

But we're not doing this for us, oh no. This is for the vegetarians and cockroaches who will be left to repopulate the planet when a lethal mix of red meat and nuclear fission wipe the rest of us out. The dream is that they won't have all this sex business getting in the way of their task.

We've taken the first step.


This post on the Narcissus Scale: 3.5


Pops


PS: My kid did really well yesterday. I have video to prove it.

PPS: Mrs. Pops is off all next week, so this might be a little sporadic for the next nine days or so. She unreasonably insists that we "spend time together" which really cuts into my sitting-alone-in-front-of-the-computer time. She is hot though, so I tolerate the intrusion.

Comments:
Congratulations! You've inspired another tasty morsel into the Tater vernacular: 'Hotter than a bucket of chum.'
 
Jesus Pete, time travel really IS possible. We're going back to the fifties, aren't we? Gee golly gosh, isn't that exciting? Just think of all the great things that will undoubtably happen. Soda fountains, poodle skirts, sock hops.. this will be swell.

Of course, on the other hand, if the right-wingers stop having sex--and reproduction still has a little something to do with our naughty bits--there might be a problem. 'Cause we all know that the evil left-wingers won't let laws stop them. They'll still be making like bunnies. Evil bunnies of porn.
 
PS: What's up with that one link? Am I not getting a joke? Is it a test to see if anyone actually checks up on the links? Did I pass? I'm confused.
 
Crap, now there's another one. 'Hotter than a bucket of chum' meets the 'evil bunnies of porn.' This blog is turning into a plagiarist's wet dream.
 
HFB: You've just made my day. I remember when I was in the sixth grade and they asked us what we wanted to achieve when we grew up. Everyone said they wanted to be policemen or firemen. Me, I said (in exactly these words) "I would like to be a plagiarist's wet dream".

The twelve year old boy inside me is smiling. At least I think he is. His voice is kind of muffled by my rib-cage.

Sunny: Erm... which link? The gay-pedophile-bestiality reference one? Shoot. I will endeavor to find another link to the famous Senator Rick Santorum "Man-on-dog" speech.
 
Fixed. It's USA Today now, nice and stable and no registering... I don't think. Unless I registered already and now it only looks like I don't need to register, but actually you might.

OK, I will summarize. The Senator said gay marriage and gay sex fall under "right to privacy" which, he contends, would also extend to illegal and deviant behavior like pedophilia or bestiality. It's charming.
 
You better watch out with that kiddie video--I'm sure it'll be deemed objectionable material for some incomprehensible reason very soon. The lesson they're pounding into our heads, yet again, is that sex is bad, violence is peachy-keen. So just channel all that nasty sexual energy into something positive, like bombing the hell out of non-Christians and hazing gays! Well, hope you enjoy your imminent increased conjugal time with Mrs. Pops--set that bucket of chum on fire! But not enough to cause an out-of-control brushfire that will cost the taxpayers billions, k?
 
Steph, the video I have has nothing in common with porn. You'd never get the two confused. What with the complete lack of any acting skill, the atrocious production value, the underwater-like sound quality, the abomoniable lighting...

I think I'll stop there. Maybe it's more like a porn tape than I thought. I'm starting to worry myself.
 
"uncovered shoulders and back of a white woman in the presence of a black man" Hmm. I think the black man's lawyer is named Atticus Finch and there's always talk of Jem, Scout and Boo Radley whenever the subject comes up.

I don't think we're back in the 50s, I KNOW we are. And also the 80s with all that Tipper Gore rate-my-records-you-frigid-bitch nonsense.

You need to count P.S.s in your Narcissus scale. Those two on this post shot your rating up to a 7 at least. Happy Thanksgiving to Pops one and all.
 
Including the PSs is something to consider, but really, it's mostly out of my hands. I cobble this thing together, shoot it over to the boys and girls at the lab over at MIT, they feed it into a tandem team of supercomputers and the NS rating comes out. I don't pretend to understand all the factors involved.

It's very similar to the way the recipe for Velveeta was arrived at.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
|

Powered by Blogger